The headline 100 Targets in 10 minutes, during Trump’s War, attests more to atrocities than prowess and particularly for Israel which operates with a permission structure that is both one -sided and culpable…is our view.
The back story to their license to slaughter at whim and will, in every century of their existence, we picked up at the 1860’s with Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism with a lust for Palestine, which his holy thoughts interpreted as Jewish homeland.
This was his solution to the Antisemitism he asserted Jews were experiencing in Europe.
We wonder why everywhere Jews live they complain of prejudice, religious persecution and receive protective status, thereafter.
No time to expand on old Bible testament about this.
But we’ll cite the psalms of recompense and vengeance that were the ‘rewards’ of those who ‘harmed’ the Jew, as a core part of the ongoing deference given to these ‘fierce warriors’.
And, not to be left out would be Jewish law and theology which, generally, views war as a necessary evil to be avoided whenever possible.
‘Necessary evil’ and avoided ‘whenever possible’ are charted with too much volatility to be rational. Manufactured ‘Necessary Evils’ don’t count, is our view.
We’ll rewind breifly to 1917 and the Balfour Declaration that pledged a national home for Jews in Palestine, then owned by Britain.
By then European Jews, following their Zionism quest under its founder Theodore Herzl, had migrated to Palestine where the Arabs were first resident, before the British arrived and took their land.
True to form…not bias just records of history..the newly arrived Jews were constantly fighting with the Arabs for rights to more land.
To stop the fighting, the British decided on a division of the land (originally owned by the Arabs) via the Peele Commission with the Jews getting 17-20%, the British retaining 8% and the Arabs getting back 72% of Palestine.
But therein lies the problem …almost the beating heart of ongoing Jewish /Muslim strife.
The Jewish allocation, included the productive, fertile lowlands of Palestine.
What the Arabs got was in the hilly, interior areas, was less suited for high-density agricultural cultivation compared to the coastal plains that the Jews got.
This sparked an extended period of hostility between Arabs and Jews in which some 750K Arabs were either displaced, expelled or just fled their homes because of Israeli ZIONIST warmongering.
Fast forward to 1947 and the United Nations-UN- decision about the allocation of Palestine which was, essentially, an adoption of the Peele decision with adjustments.
Britain, by then, had requested to give up its mandate over the Palestine partition between the Arabs and Jews because of incessant fighting between the groups. In its Resolution 181, the UN divided the land formerly owned by the Arabs into a 56.47% Jewish portion and a 42.88% Arab owner ship, citing anticipated migration of Jews due to the Holocaust.
The proposal included the establishment of statehood for both nations, with Jerusalem as a capital city to be owned by them both which the Arabs rejected. Fighting, thus, remained the common denominator between the two sides.
But it was this statement from Sir Winston Churchill at the Peel Commission, that spotlighted the thinking behind the division largess to the Jews, who were elevated above the Arabs and rewarded with the Arabs’ patrimony ahead of them.
Ascribing that ‘dog in the manger’ metophor to revoke Arab land- claiming they were ill equipped to develop it to ‘Churchill’s standards of viability- remains the defintion of pillage and plunder.
We know Jews come in shades darker than European Jews. But Churchill’s rationale was coined specifically for the whiter Jews, given his comparison to ‘Red Indians’ and the ‘Black People’ of Australia.
He saw people who were not white as lesser, to justify the looting and marauding they inflicted upon them, in the name of white superiority.
It, also, tells us how Jews leverage their wealth and how this wealth, through political lobbying, can negatively impact other people …and for generations.
Quick aside on Rothschild.
He was already bankrolling several settlements in Jewish Palestine and Herzl wanted himm to buy Palestine from the Ottoman Turks.
Fast forward to current day and the Jewish financial influence on Trump’s war.
The current strife, Donald Trump’s war with Netanyahu as his Co Kommandant against Iran, is an extension of this back story with a modern twist to induced war, corruption, revenge and conquer.
For character witness, there’s barely daylight between Netanyahu and Trump, both being recorded philanderers, who had to make public apologies to their wives for ‘indiscretions’.
They’re both first in their portfolios of Prime Minister (PM) and President to be accused and indicted for fraud, bribery and a combination of corrupt activities…including illegal use of funds raised for political
activities.
Netanyahu has rejiggered his tenure and has not been tried, though he has been indicted since 2019, because his constitution does not permit a sitting PM to be tried on legal indictments. Hence, his continuous wars to stay in power, utilizing legal changes, political maneuvering and the shield of ‘war time leader’ to remain above the law.
Trump, a public wart in his right, is a beneficiary of the perversion of the term American Exceptionalism. He was still allowed on the ballot after being found guilty of 34 felonies, NOT EXCLUDING RAPE.
The quest to deny Iran a nuclear weapon may be worthy. But its descent into managed instability questions the haste to engagement, versus tactical out comes.
This seems to affirm the thinking that these ‘warriors’, Trump and Netanyahu, are fighting for personal political survival under the guise of war.
And with their combined criminality, they’re taking it bigger and higher.
Trump’s Riviera of the Middle East reference to Palestine, right before the his war, was his usual lack of impulse control, the sub-adult mechanics of his brain. He’s never far from a good grift. The Special Envoy roles he created for son-in-law, Jared Kushner and Friend, Steve Whitkoff, both real estate investors, was a telegraph.
Neither is a skilled negotiator, so, we know their sitting down with Middle East Leaders could only be about post-war contracts ……for clean up and rebuilding.
And, Trump’s no stranger to Middle East business ventures. The ticker tape of some of his enterprising in the region would include millions for licensing and management fees for Trump- branded golf courses.
While the war may be bumbling through designated objectives, Netanyahu, expansionist bar none, is pushing in to Lebanon, seizing land for Jews under the guise of establishing buffer zones to eliminate threats to Israel.
To say that there was no basis for war with Iran is to under score that there was no imminent threat as espoused by Netanayahu and that Trump was an easy mark for his cunning.
Undoubtedly, Trump agreed to use American military forces to attack Iran.
His reason, an assessment that for 47 years, Presidents failed to attack Iran because they “lacked the guts and courage” he has, was buoyed, cajolingly, by Netanyahu’s massaging of his needy ego, not for America’s but Israel’s benefit.
And we’re learning ,even, more.
Netanyahu’s ulimate goal was always to reroute the pipelines from Iran to bypass the Strait of Hormuz to flow through Israel and to be commerced from Israeli Mediterranean ports …the portion of land the Peele Commission designated as more suitable for Jews.
We won’t speculate on the ‘drums of palm grease’ Trump would have received as compensation for doing what previous Presidents were too patriotic and intelligent- per Secretary John Kerry– to do for 47 years.
Neither will we disregard Former Secretary Hillary Clinton’s confirmation of Netanyahu’s dream for Israel and America to engage in open ended war with Iran, wich was ignored by every President except Trump.
But we’ll bet it’s in the tonnage.
